Sunday, 19 February 2012

'Nodding disease' confounds experts, kills children

Patrick Anywar, 14, lies curled up naked in the dust and midday heat of a Ugandan village, struggling to look up at his younger brother and sister playing in front of the family home.
After a minute's effort to face his siblings, Anywar's head slumps onto his chest and his emaciated body is gripped by convulsions.
Anywar is one of more than 3,000 children in northern Uganda who are suffering from a debilitating mystery ailment known as nodding disease, which has touched almost every family in the village of Tumangu.
For several years, scientists have tried and failed to determine the cause of the illness, which locals say has killed hundreds of youngsters.
What they do know is that the disease affects only children and gradually devastates its victims through debilitating seizures, stunted growth, wasted limbs, mental disabilities and sometimes starvation.
Anywar's mother, Rugina Abwoyo, has already lost one son, named Watmon, to the disease in 2010. Now she says she can do little but watch on helplessly as another child slips away.
"Before he was walking and running like other children, but now someone always has to stay home to look after him," Abwoyo told AFP. "The disease is terrible -- it does not let him drink or eat by himself."
Walking along footpaths cut through the sorghum plantations, Joe Otto, a volunteer health worker, explains how nodding disease has ravaged Tumangu, about 450 kilometres (280 miles) north of the capital Kampala.
"There are 780 people living in this village and we have 97 cases of the disease. It has affected almost every family," Otto, 54, told AFP.
Whenever sporadic deliveries of medicine arrive at the local health centre several kilometres away, Otto pedals his bicycle to fetch the drugs. But he knows that they only offer a short-term solution.
"We are giving out drugs for epilepsy, like carbamazepine, but this disease is different from epilepsy," Otto said.
Instead, as the disease has torn through their community, local residents have moved from fear to a grim acceptance, Otto says.
"We started saying that the patient who had died was the one who had been cured, because finally they were at rest from this painful disease," Otto said.
Scientists are trying to find a cure: since 2010, researchers ranging from epidemiologists to environmental experts, neurologists, toxicologists and psychiatrists have carried out a range of tests.
Investigations have looked at possible links between the disease and everything from a parasite that causes river blindness, to malnutrition and the after-effects of a civil war that ravaged northern Uganda for decades.
"We looked at all this, but unfortunately we were not able to pinpoint any significant contributing or risk factors," said Miriam Nanyunja, disease control and prevention officer at the World Health Organisation in Kampala.
"The search for the causative agent is still ongoing," she added.
Often the results have thrown up more questions than answers. Scientists do not know if the disease is linked to similar outbreaks in neighbouring South Sudan and Tanzania.
Efforts continue to understand if the disease is still spreading or has peaked -- and why it is seems confined only to certain communities.
Last month, after pressure from lawmakers from affected areas, Uganda's health ministry produced an emergency response plan to try to identify and control the disease.
However, Nanyunja says that while the search for the cause and a possible cure goes on, for now, doctors can only focus on trying to alleviate the symptoms.
"There are many diseases that we continue to treat symptomatically, without knowing the exact cause," Nanyunja said.
But for Patrick Anywar, any attempts to curb or cure the disease may come too late.
"We are hoping that the doctors work very hard to get the cure for this disease," his mother Abwoyo says.
"There is no future for us as so many children have already been affected, but we hope that our youngest can be saved."

Friday, 17 February 2012

INGAT MINIFESTO PKR SELANGOR?

Pakatan pembangkang dalam manifestonya pernah berjanji akan membuka tabung permulaan sebanyak RM100 bagi setiap kelahiran anak Selangor.
Bagaimanapun, katanya, persoalan timbul apabila laporan Tabung Wawasan Anak Selangor (Tawas) menunjukkan, sehingga 16 April 2010 hanya 300 bayi yang mendapat kemudahan tabung tersebut.
“Mereka juga berjanji akan memberikan bantuan RM75 sebulan bagi setiap anak yang dihantar ke nurseri, memberi bantuan RM50 sebulan seorang bagi pendidikan prasekolah, elaun kepada ibu-ibu tunggal yang layak dan elaun khas kepada suri rumah yang memilih untuk menjaga sepenuh masa anak-anak kecil mereka sekiranya diberi amanah memerintah negeri Selangor

PAS, DAP & PARTI KEADILAN RAKYAT MANIFESTO’S

It has caused me to wonder why the focus of the manifestos of PAS, DAP and PKR are so much on reducing oil prices at the pump as reducing the cost of petrol and diesel to consumers only affect a small portion of the society. Just tell me how much of our low income earners actually spend on petrol or diesel? Take for example someone who rides a bike daily to work, how much do you think he spends on petrol every month? I would say the most could be less than RM100 a month. Now tell me how much does someone who drives a mercedez, bmw, land rover, volvo, audi and other types of high gasoline guzzlers and who also has more than one car actually spend on petrol every month? My fair guess would be more than RM400 a month. So should we allow the Government to take people’s money and subsidises the rich? Who says by increasing oil prices will affect the poor? How do you think those our poor neneks and datuks who still ride bicyles to get around will be affected by oil increase?
PAKCIK MISKIN NAIK BASIKAL
SHOULD DAP, PAS AND PKR TAKE THIS PAKCIK’S MONEY AND GIVE IT TO THE RICH WHO DRIVES A BMW? HOW COULD THIS PAKCIK WHO RIDES A BICYCLE AROUND THE KAMPUNG CAN BE AFFECTED BY RISING OIL PRICES..?
Some of you may feel a bit unease with my statement above, yes, some of you might think that the price of other consumer products such as cooking oil, roti canai and so on will increase because of the oil price hike. Nope, by right they shouldn’t! You have various types of cooking oils. You have those based on palm oil, soya and these are totally unrelated to the price of crude oil!! These are based on plants and commodity prices in its own market. The more we plant them, the more supply we have for palm oils and soya and the price will drop accordingly. Those “penyangak” operating unreasonable “mamak restaurants” and small retailers just like to use this as a stupid reason to profit more. So far, the government has been doing the right thing by putting these products under controlled items act. To help the poor, the incumbent government has also provided diesel subsidies to our fishermen. This is a step in the right direction. Although I understand there are issues about fishermen not going to the sea capturing the fish but selling the diesel to outside parties but this is totally separate matter but I believe the main objective of helping the fishermen to have a better life has been fulfilled. Through the use of fleetcard system, transport operators that are serving the low to middle income bracket in MALAYSIA have also been able to get discounts on diesel. This is more targeted rather than increasing fuel subsidies across the board.
REDUCING THE PRICE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT
I wish all of the political parties should read this statement. Why bother about oil subsidies? Why no one actually bothers about reducing the travel costs on LRTs and busses? These are the main medium of transport of low to middle income earners don’t you agree? LRT’s monthly ticket has increased from previously moderate at RM60 to RM90 and this year the price has further increased to RM100 (for travels on LRT only). This is a bit too much for me and when this happens, I can really feel the pain. So why not campaigning for a lower ticket price of public transport or making it totally FREE even. This will definitely increase its usage thus sharp reduction in domestic oil demand and subsequently the oil subsidies burden of the government? It can also reduce the problem of traffic congestion and not to mention making buildng more access roads and bridges irrelevant or redundant! Thus saving more people’s money. The fact is it has more than tripple whammy effect! Sometimes you just need to think out of the box to solve issues. The focus should be on the solution not on the issue! I bet if we can make LRT free, it will affect more low to middle income earners’ lives rather than reduction of oil price can ever have. Now the future government only have to:
  • Create more parking space at the LRT stations which is lower than the costs of building SMART tunnels, bridges etc.
  • Add more carriages to PUTRA and STAR trains as now the carriages have been severely congested and the Transport Minister should try to take LRT during peak hours in the morning to know what I mean.
The pledge of all Opposition parties to reduce oil price if elected has made me worried unduly as they are not tackling the crux of the issue. The government under PAK LAH has correctly maintained the oil price in the face of current rising oil prices environment. PAS’ statement in its manifesto, “To ensure that the price of petrol and diesel be reduced and maintained at a reasonable price as to suppress Inflationary pressure on all goods and services” is totally out of context and does not hit all the right buttons! The same goes for DAP and PKR who are totally and equally clueless about petroleum resource management.
THE LOGIC
Often subsidies are a way of deferring economic shocks that are near inevitable. If you keep supporting subsidies ignoring all economic logic and global conditions, when they invariably do catch up the blow can be very severe. On the other hand a gradual rise in prices can lead to a smoother transition to a world of necessarily higher energy costs. Continued subsidisation will lead to artificial demand and penalise the economy in the long term.
WHY PETRONAS SHOULDN’T SUBSIDISE
Petronas is not the only player in the domestic products retail market and it would be unfair for Petronas, which holds only a 30 per cent market share, to subsidise petrol and diesel prices as it would mean that it is subsidising all the other domestic fuel oil companies such as SHELL and EXXON-MOBIL in Malaysia. Requiring the other oil companies in Malaysia to also subsidise prices of petrol and diesel would likewise be unfair as it would eat up the already slim margin they are making under the Automatic Pricing Mechanism. Worse still, it may drive the companies out of Malaysia and cripple the country’s petroleum products retail system.
In the previous interview by Business Times, YBhg. Tan Sri Mohd Hassan said “as a business entity, imposing additional burden of subsidising petrol and diesel prices may have serious implications on international investors’ confidence in Petronas. It may result in downgrading of the oil company’s ratings by international rating agencies“, he added. PETRONAS has suffered big rating drop during financial crisis due to its bail out of certain companies and it has made them difficult to raise funds to finance its exploration business. It takes sometimes for it to build it its cash reserves again and get an upgraded rating.
In addition, up to 31 March 2007, PETRONAS has contributed about RM 336 billion to the government in the form of taxes, dividends, export duties and royalties. This amount is huge.
Do you know that PERTAMINA in Indonesia has run into trouble during the financial crisis in 1997-98 because its heavy subsidisation of domestic fuel oil? High subsidies has resulted in low cash for exploration activities to sustain its revenue as a result banyak yang tergadai! They have to give up some fields to EXXON-MOBIL to do the exploration work and get the most oil from its country. Indonesia only gets very small portion of its own reserves! All because they don’t have the money to spend on exploration costs. So do we want to repeat the same mistake? You can read about PERTAMINA here. The fact of the matter is that PETRONAS is already currently paying a significant amounts of its net profit to MALAYSIAN government as dividend and subsidising the our electricity for about RM6.1 billion (in FY06/07). PAS even said, they would like to put PETRONAS under the parliament to scrutinise its spending. What is this supposed to mean? If they believe, current money contributed by PETRONAS is mismanaged, why did they PROPOSE to take out more money from PETRONAS? Wouldn’t this a reflection of further mismanagement? Not only money but future generations resources? If they do believe the current fund is mismanaged, why not take the current money and use it in a correct way without having to resort to further extraction of money from PETRONAS? The current so called “funds being mismanaged” can be diverted to the “correct” way of spending such as oil subsidies or public transport funding. Our national oil reserves are depleting, if PETRONAS does not have enough money to invest overseas to diversify its operations, we all will be at the losing end. PETRONAS currently contributes almost 30% of our GDP, what if this 30% is gone? This could also mean no free education or domestic oil subsidies even. Guys, just don’t be lazy..please google the internet for issues on “oil subsidies”, “petroleum resource management”..just don’t take statements at face value! Don’t let the Opposition fool us on things that they don’t even know about.

CONTRADICTING STATEMENTS
COMMENTS BY JEFFOOI on PETRONAS SubsidiesJeff Ooi is acutely aware of PETRONAS’ predicament and the depleting nature of our oil resources and even write it in his blog, but yet allow his party DAP to act otherwise.
COMMENT BY LIM KIT SIANG on PETROLEUM RESOURCES MANAGEMENT on his blog – “Therefore the DAP proposes that the Government legislate that 50% of our windfall from oil and gas is kept under lock and key, with the sole purpose for investment in human capital as well as research & development, over and beyond our typical expenditure on education and training“. If he suggests it should be kept under lock and key, why asking PETRONAS to contribute more that it already has? It has already contributed almost 50% of it NPBT to Government (Dividends, taxes, royalties and export duties). So what does he mean really?

So you know who to vote now! :):)



BARISAN NASIONAL MANIFESTO

NURUL IZZAH BERTANDING UNTUK KERUSI PARLIMEN LEMBAH PANTAI!
Nurul Izzah facing uphill battle to contest against Datuk Shahrizat Abdul Jalil for LEMBAH PANTAI’s parliamentary seat.



NURUL IZZAH - PARLIMEN LEMBAH PANTAIN


NURUL IZZAH DI LEMBAH PANTAI – SEWAKTU PENAMAAN CALON








NURUL IZZAH - PARLIMEN LEMBAH PANTAIN


NURUL IZZAH AND HER DAD AND HUSBAND



NURUL IZZAH - PARLIMEN LEMBAH PANTAIN


NURUL IZZAH AND SUPPORTERS


NURUL IZZAH - PARLIMEN LEMBAH PANTAIN




CANVASSING FOR VOTES



NURUL IZZAH FOR LEMBAH PANTAI, KUALA LUMPUR



SUPPORTERS OF NURUL IZZAH

Thursday, 16 February 2012

Tips penting perlu diperiksa sebelum membeli handphoneKongsi315



SEBELUM anda membeli telefon bimbit ada tips penting yang harus diikuti untuk memastikan anda membeli telefon yang terbaik, atau sekurang-kurangnya anda mengetahui tahap kualiti telefon bimbit anda.

Sebelum membeli, pastikan anda memeriksa dahulu no IMEI [International Mobile Equipment Identity], untuk mengetahui keaslian handphone yang ingin dibeli.

Tekan *#06# akan tertera satu siri nombor unik contohnya seperti 359598040475402. Perhatikan nombor yang ke 7 dan ke 8. Contohnya, untuk no siri 359598040475402, no ke 7 dan ke 8 ialah, 04.

Dari sini anda boleh mengetahui tahap keaslian dan kualiti telefon bimbit yang ingin dibeli. Rujuk data di bawah.

02 atau 20 : dari China = KUALITI RENDAH
08 atau 80: dari Germany = KUALITI SEDERHANA
01 atau 10: dari Finland = TERBAIK
00 atau 03 atau 04: dari kilang asal = SANGAT TERBAIK
13 : dari Azerbaijan = SANGAT KURANG KUALITI & MERBAHAYA

Wednesday, 15 February 2012

Parti Pakatan Rakyat hendak bubar FELDA. Tanah yang diusahakan peneroka akan diambil.

Bubar Felda Jika Pakatan Rakyat Berjaya Memerintah
Bubar Felda Jika Pakatan Rakyat Berjaya Memerintah
SEBETULNYA ada rahmat disebalik usaha penyenaraian Felda Global Ventures (FGV) yang kini mendapat tentangan pelbagai pihak dalam masyarakat peneroka sendiri seperti dizahirkan melalui pendedahan yang dibuat NGO-NGO seperti ANAK dan sebagainya.
Sepanjang usaha penyenaraian ini berlangsung, kita didedahkan dengan pelbagai kepincangan dan taktik kotor Felda untuk menindas peneroka dengan penyenaraian tersebut. Itu belum lagi menyentuh tentang hasil perahan getah yang terbukti merugikan peneroka seperti dalam kes sebuah kawasan Felda di Kelantan.
Semua ini membuat kita tertanya-tanya adakah Felda ini sebenarnya membantu atau menindas peneroka?
Ya, memanglah, ada kejayaan yang ditonjol di sana sini tapi itu semua tidak cukup untuk mengatakan ratusan ribu peneroka sedia ada benar-benar memperolehi faedah daripada skim yang ditawarkan Felda.
Yang paling menonjol hanyalah pemilikan tanah.
Rakyat yang dahulu tidak berpeluang mempunyai tanah sendiri tapi boleh memperolehi 10 ekar tanah untuk diteroka menjadi kebun getah atau sawit dan suku ekar tanah untuk dijadikan tapak rumah, dengan menyertai skim Felda.
Tapi ia juga mencetus persoalan lain yang lebih besar iaitu bagaimana pembahagian tanah untuk rakyat negara ini dijalankan secara adil dan samarata antara semua kelompok masyarakat.
Kalau berkesempatan meninjau kawasan penempatan Felda hari ini, majoriti daripadanya adalah didiami oleh orang Melayu, bermaksud orang Melayu juga yang menguasai hampir kesemua tanah-tanah rancangan Felda di seluruh negara.
Adakah ini adil kepada masyarakat cina dan India yang juga memegang taraf kerakyatan yang sama? Mereka juga perlu diberi peluang meneroka tanah pertanian seperti mana orang Melayu di kawasan Felda.
Penulis difahamkan bahawa Pakatan Rakyat akan memastikan setiap rakyat negara ini akan memiliki tanah sendiri jika berjaya memerintah negara. Ini adalah selari dengan kenyataan Ketua Penerangan PAS, Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man mengenai perkara tersebut disini.
Penulis berpendapat ia sangat sukar kerana kawasan tanah baru yang boleh diteroka sekarang sudah semakin mengecil. Menukar status hutan simpan sedia ada untuk dibangunkan bagi memenuhi komitmen tersebut juga adalah satu langkah yang bukan sahaja tidak bijak, malah menghapuskan ekosistem negara kita dalam masa yang sama.
Tapi ia tidak mustahil kalau Pakatan Rakyat membubarkan Felda.
Pada hemat penulis, jika Pakatan Rakyat membubarkan Felda, ia akan membuka peluang pemilikan tanah kepada lebih ramai rakyat. Dengan 10 ekar tanah kebun yang dimiliki seorang peneroka sekarang, ia boleh dipecah-pecahkan kepada 40 orang lain jika setiap seorang diperuntukkan suku ekar tanah.
Sementara peneroka sedia ada boleh terus memiliki tapak rumah (dengan keluasan yang sama) sekarang.
Tidak sahaja menyelesaikan masalah tanah di kalangan rakyat, Pakatan Rakyat juga mampu menghapuskan segala ketidak adilan dalam sistem Felda sekarang dan menukarkannya kepada sesuatu yang lebih baru dan memuaskan hati semua pihak.
Lagipun amat tidak adil jika peruntukkan berbilion ringgit yang dibelanjakan untuk Felda sekarang hanya dimiliki oleh satu kaum sahaja kerana wang itu juga adalah wang pembayar cukai seluruh rakyat negara ini tidak mengira kaum.
Pakatan Rakyat tidak seharusnya meneruskan tradisi BN (sejak penubuhan Felda) yang terlalu memanjakan peneroka dengan pelbagai kemudahan dan peruntukan yang banyak, sedangkan ada diantara mereka sekarang sudah tidak layak menerima bantuan tersebut.
Pakatan Rakyat perlu juga memikirkan kawasan-kawasan kampung tradisional dan kampung baru yang turut memerlukan suntikan dana dari kerajaan untuk tujuan pembangunan.
Atas nama kesaksamaan dan demi menunjukkan kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat tidak mengamalkan diskriminasi, Felda harus dibubarkan.
Selain dari semua justifikasi di atas, Felda juga telah berjaya mencapai matlamatnya untuk mengeluarkan kelompok masyarakat sasaran dari belenggu kemiskinan.
Dan dengan itu golongan peneroka ini tidak perlukan bantuan kerajaan lagi.
Artikel Berkaitan:

Saturday, 4 February 2012

ZURAIDAH MAK LAMPIR HAS NO RIGHT TO MEDDLE

Zuraidah has no right to meddle’
B Nantha Kumar
| January 31, 2011
Trouble is brewing in the Hulu Selangor District Council as resentment mounts over the alleged interference of a parliamentarian.
KUALA KUBU BARU: The Hulu Selangor District Council (MDHS) is seeing red over Ampang MP Zuraidah Kamaruddin’s alleged interference in the council’s internal issues.
A disgruntled MDHS officer told FMT that Zuraidah was constantly interfering in the council’s decisions although she had “no business” doing so.
Speaking to FMT, the officer, who declined to be named, said the latest incident involved a meeting which the president had called to appoint committee members for the tender quotation committee.
“Zuraidah called up our president Tukiman Nail and ordered him to postpone the meeting. This is not the first time she has done this. She has interfered in other internal council matters as well.
“It is very frustrating. She has no business doing this,” he said, adding that Zuraidah was always making arbitrary decisions in matters involving MDHS without discussing with the council.
A quick FMT check revealed that the MDHS letter of invitation for the meeting was sent to four district council members and copied to PKR Hulu Selangor division.
The letter, however, omitted former councillor Razali Mokthar, who is believed to be aligned with Zuraidah.
“This whole problem started after Zuraidah became aware that Razali was sidelined. On Jan 13, she called the president and asked him to postpone the meeting. Because she was the PKR women’s chief with influence at the top, Tukiman followed her instruction.
“But my question is, who is she to direct MDHS to defer the meeting? What is her position in the state government?
“As far as we are concerned, she is only a parliamentarian and PKR women chief. Is that enough for her to control the council?” he asked.
He urged Selangor Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahim to step in and probe Zuraidah’s misconduct.
Meanwhile, efforts to reach the PKR Hulu Selangor chief Nazar Yakin for further details were futile.